Difference between revisions of "WLRH Internet Connection Project"
m (Fix one redacting.) |
(Add that the meeting has been scheduled.) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
#* Done as of 23 Mar 2018 | #* Done as of 23 Mar 2018 | ||
# Meet with {{redacted}} to make the offer of providing this service, on behalf of Makers Local. | # Meet with {{redacted}} to make the offer of providing this service, on behalf of Makers Local. | ||
+ | #* Meeting has been scheduled as of 13 Apr 2018 | ||
# Decide on a location for the "receiver" equipment. | # Decide on a location for the "receiver" equipment. | ||
# Decide on a location for the "transmitter" equipment. | # Decide on a location for the "transmitter" equipment. |
Revision as of 22:11, 15 April 2018
Creator: |
Contents
[hide]Overview
Due to <redacted>, it has proven impossible or at least impractical for <redacted> to gain access to a high-throughput Internet connection, despite <redacted> being incredibly nearby, and also being ready and willing to offer the connection itself. The only missing piece is the infrastructural build-out between the two. Since Makers Local has some expertise in point-to-point wireless (and is developing more as we speak), I figured we could help a fellow not-for-profit organization out, and come up with a solution to that problem.
Steps
-
Gain approval from <redacted> to provide network services from their location for this purpose.- Done as of 23 Mar 2018
- Meet with <redacted> to make the offer of providing this service, on behalf of Makers Local.
- Meeting has been scheduled as of 13 Apr 2018
- Decide on a location for the "receiver" equipment.
- Decide on a location for the "transmitter" equipment.
- Technically they are both receivers and transmitters, but you get what I mean.
- Decide on appropriate equipment based on those locations.
- Buy and donate the equipment.
- Install the equipment.
- Set up the equipment.
- ???
- Non-profit
Details
Make the offer
It should be clear that the support for the link will come from a Makers Local point of contact, and the rest will be best-effort. It may be worth covering what the needs are, and if non-critical services can use this link while critical services use the existing one. Maybe some sort of failover scheme.