Difference between revisions of "Talk:Second Draft Bylaws"
From Makers Local 256
(minor clarifications needed) |
m (more explanation) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | * under heading 2.1.2, board member eligibility, it states that eligibility requires 3 consecutive months of membership. It does NOT specify when this 3 months has to be. I would prefer to tack "leading up to the election" on the end of the statement there. --[[User:Opticron|Opticron]] 09:16, 29 September 2009 (CDT) | + | * under heading 2.1.2, board member eligibility, it states that eligibility requires 3 consecutive months of membership. It does NOT specify when this 3 months has to be. I would prefer to tack "leading up to the election" on the end of the statement there. as is, the specified 3 months could have been 5 years ago and the person could have been an active member again for less than a month when the election occurs. --[[User:Opticron|Opticron]] 09:16, 29 September 2009 (CDT) |
* under heading 2.2.2, board member rights and responsibilities, there is mention of voting that is duplicate and possibly contrary information, depending on how it is read. It should be stricken from that section. --[[User:Opticron|Opticron]] 09:16, 29 September 2009 (CDT) | * under heading 2.2.2, board member rights and responsibilities, there is mention of voting that is duplicate and possibly contrary information, depending on how it is read. It should be stricken from that section. --[[User:Opticron|Opticron]] 09:16, 29 September 2009 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 09:40, 29 September 2009
- under heading 2.1.2, board member eligibility, it states that eligibility requires 3 consecutive months of membership. It does NOT specify when this 3 months has to be. I would prefer to tack "leading up to the election" on the end of the statement there. as is, the specified 3 months could have been 5 years ago and the person could have been an active member again for less than a month when the election occurs. --Opticron 09:16, 29 September 2009 (CDT)
- under heading 2.2.2, board member rights and responsibilities, there is mention of voting that is duplicate and possibly contrary information, depending on how it is read. It should be stricken from that section. --Opticron 09:16, 29 September 2009 (CDT)
