Difference between revisions of "Talk:Licensing"

From Makers Local 256
Jump to: navigation, search
(little more detail)
m (License for all projects: comments on BY-NC-SA)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== License for all projects ==
 
== License for all projects ==
 
As of today we have an overall license for the wiki.  That license is [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ BY-NC-ND].  Which to me seems a little restrictive.  Makers Local was created to share and work on ideas, and this license goes ageist that by not allowing  Derivative Works.  I would like to purpose the Overall License be changed to [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ BY-NC-SA]. --[[User:Jim Shoe|JimShoe]] 11:24, 20 May 2008 (CDT)
 
As of today we have an overall license for the wiki.  That license is [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ BY-NC-ND].  Which to me seems a little restrictive.  Makers Local was created to share and work on ideas, and this license goes ageist that by not allowing  Derivative Works.  I would like to purpose the Overall License be changed to [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ BY-NC-SA]. --[[User:Jim Shoe|JimShoe]] 11:24, 20 May 2008 (CDT)
 +
 +
I like that license. However, this does mean that any project put here on the wiki is immediately disqualified for commercial application. So if one of us decides project X should be a billion-dollar business, we can't do it. Not that this is necessarily a bad thing, but we should make it clear that any possible! commercial projects should stay off the wiki. Is that what we want? I'm ok with it, but we should put it to a vote. --[[User:Nykodemus|Nykodemus]] 14:52, 21 May 2008 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 14:52, 21 May 2008

License for all projects

As of today we have an overall license for the wiki. That license is BY-NC-ND. Which to me seems a little restrictive. Makers Local was created to share and work on ideas, and this license goes ageist that by not allowing Derivative Works. I would like to purpose the Overall License be changed to BY-NC-SA. --JimShoe 11:24, 20 May 2008 (CDT)

I like that license. However, this does mean that any project put here on the wiki is immediately disqualified for commercial application. So if one of us decides project X should be a billion-dollar business, we can't do it. Not that this is necessarily a bad thing, but we should make it clear that any possible! commercial projects should stay off the wiki. Is that what we want? I'm ok with it, but we should put it to a vote. --Nykodemus 14:52, 21 May 2008 (CDT)