Difference between revisions of "Talk:SMS Text Message User"
From Makers Local 256
(added comments) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't know if over using an optional service would really help you get out of your contract. I think you would still have to pay a termination charge. --[[User:Jim Shoe|JimShoe]] 16:48, 15 July 2008 (CDT) | I don't know if over using an optional service would really help you get out of your contract. I think you would still have to pay a termination charge. --[[User:Jim Shoe|JimShoe]] 16:48, 15 July 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | It's not the overuse that gets you out of the contract, it's using a text message that was costing you $0.15 cents, | ||
| + | and then when they raise their rates to $0.20 a material difference in contract occurs (because you signed up for a contract when the rates were $0.15). If you use one of your 300 prepaid messages, no material difference has occurred, so no breach of contract. But message #301 (on a 300 prepaid message plan) allows an instance of material difference should the rates change.--[[User:Omegix|Omegix]] 17:09, 15 July 2008 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:09, 15 July 2008
I don't know if over using an optional service would really help you get out of your contract. I think you would still have to pay a termination charge. --JimShoe 16:48, 15 July 2008 (CDT)
It's not the overuse that gets you out of the contract, it's using a text message that was costing you $0.15 cents, and then when they raise their rates to $0.20 a material difference in contract occurs (because you signed up for a contract when the rates were $0.15). If you use one of your 300 prepaid messages, no material difference has occurred, so no breach of contract. But message #301 (on a 300 prepaid message plan) allows an instance of material difference should the rates change.--Omegix 17:09, 15 July 2008 (CDT)
